Tuesday, September 2, 2014
Hopes Alive in Change Management
Monday, January 7, 2013
Benefits and advantages of Chai Board
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
True Dialogue (Part 1 : a proposal)
As a sequel to the program we had to visit one of the participants’ Shri Sameer Golwalekar, a multidimensional personality having interests in multitude of subjects. Our discussions wandered into many topics such as world history, Indian culture, Current business scenario, European psychology, J Krishnamurthi etc. At the end of the discussion he presented us with a book titled “On Dialogue” written by David Bohm, Professor of Theoretical physics. The specific choice of the gift was not random, it was after understanding the methodology, intention and service that we provide to the Business fraternity, that he suggested that we must go through this tome.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
What is Chai Board?
'Chai Board is a service developed by Marg Atreya Consulting, way back in 2007 to help the business organisations to make the 'business' meetings effective. It was designed after years of experience and research.
Before jotting the attributes of chai board, let us scan the environment prevalent in many of the organisations. There is a subtle, intangible, but real pain in most of the organisations. One common overheard statement in most of the organisations is " how am I supposed to get my work done with all of these meetings?' Meetins are hated and tolerated by many and most believe that it is a waste of time. Yes it is ... if not conducted , moderated or facilitated properly.
There is the frustration of calling a meeting to make a decision and watching the meeting spiral into a battle between rival departments, divisions, partners, product lines, business units etc or get lost in confusion over the meaning of a technical term, in proving ones point of view as more superior etc. These meetings first has the frustration of reaching a decision and then having to abandon the decision because there was'nt enough 'buy-in'. This is the pain of fragmented 'social capital'.
Part of the pain is a misunderstanding of the nature of the problems at hand. The failed meetings are due to a special class of problems called 'wicked problems". Business organisations have them plenty, but they are niether recognised or are attempted to be solved in logical method , with tools / techniques meant to handle well defined problems. Wicked problems are ill-defined ones and a force of fragmentation. Most business organisations, small or big, today have significant wicked elements. Most of the business owners and managers are not recognising the presence of such phenomenon instead they sub- consciously accept the situation and apply what they know best. In meetings they follow the traditional way of agenda making, following it with tick marks as the ponts are discussed and concluding the meeting as the agenda is completed.
Another source of pain is the social complexity, ie the number and diversity of players who are involved in the business. The more people involved in a business the more social complexity and the more diverse these people are , the more social complexity. Often people who come to the meetings see themmseves as more seperate than united. In many of the organisation the uniting force /system / theme is missing,
Thus presence of wicked problems and social complexity makes the meeting less effective. As a solution to overcome these problems Chai Boad was designed.
Chai Board is an opportunity to share business insights face-to-face
Chai Board is a small informal gathering (3 to 20 people) assembled to engage in 'fertile dialogues' to develop and share insights.
Time suited for Chai Board is mid morning or mid afternoon ar early evening when participants are relaxed and enjoying a cup of tea.
The duration of Chai board may be 90 minutes or more depending on the enthusiasm and energy of people. (usually it takes 120 minutes minimum)
The heart of Chai Board is dialogues.......
For want of honest, direct and open conversations, careers are derailed and
organizations lose money. For lack of truth telling, bad behavior is tolerated and,
in fact, spreads, infecting others who become cynical or indifferent.
Fertile dialogues are required to float the realities of business and to grow the business.
Indicators of fertile Dialogues are openness, informality and energy.
Chai Board facilitates fertile dialogues.
Dialogue is the core of business team work and the basic unit of work.
Conversations can be stilted, politicised, a personality biopsy, domineering, fragmented, clouting, masked, adversarial, vengeful etc
or
Conversations can be reality based, asking right questions, listening oriented, empathatic, solution oriented, authentic, debating the issue etc.
Chai board focusses on the latter kind of conversations.
The Chai Board value point : Spending time in dialogues in the prresence of a facilitator creates insights and enhances learning.
Chai Board captures moments of truth.
Chai Board engages people in spontaneous / fertile dialogues
Chai Board triggers alternate thinking routes
Chai Board facilitates insight learning
Chai Board creates genuine bonds
We are proud to overhear that our clients are using the term often ... such as .... 'Lets have a chai board tomorrow...." indicating this is distinct from their other routine meetings.
contributed by Sasikanth PrabhuWednesday, December 14, 2011
Entry Barriers
contributed by Sasikanth Prabhu
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Visioning

Now we have facilitated visioning exercise of more than 50 small businesses. Recently we did visioning program for a Automotive parts manufacturing Company in Dewas (Madhya Pradesh). This company was introduced by our friend Yogesh Jain who also became an ardent follower of School of Strategy and he runs his organisation Niche Quality Solutions Pvt Ltd (http://nicheqs.com/), which has long experience in providing Six sigma, Quality solutions to organisations in and around Indore. An year's experience in strategy workshops have given him an opportunity to develop an unconventional perspectives on business growth. He says " I have attended many management programs organised by institutions such as IMA.... but the business strategy workshops are different and they really add value to the organisation. There is a sense of fulfillment in taking part in these sessions". It is wonderful to work with him now... ...
During the meetings with business owners the question that comes up a lot in the work we do is the difference between vision and mission. At times we come across companies which do not bother to distinguish them at all: but...They have a separate Values Statement (thank goodness), but if you ask them to tell their Vision, and then their Mission, they’ll give you the same answer for both questions. So what is . difference? Does it matter? Yes it does! we will see visioning here .
- A strategic vision is usually thought to be solely future oriented. A vision provides an organization a forward looking, idealized image of itself.
- Moves outside the usual assumptions.
- Concentrates on the end goal, not the means to reach the goal.
- Followers gain ownership by developing the means (action plan).
Another benefit when done together with the people in the organisation is shared vision, which includes a present component.
- Vision is not a destination, but an intangible structure that surrounds us and guides our daily activities. From this perspective, a shared vision is a form of self-identity.
Regularly feedback can be employed for both corrective action and vision revision (interesting combination of words). If the feedback indicates a problem in the implementation and nothing amiss in the expected vision then the strategy and/or tactics can be altered to get back on track toward the vision. And if there is an indication that the vision is no longer realistic there is no problem with a shift in vision to a more workable vision. Normal planning cycles allow for such a step on an annual or half yearly basis.
ImplicationsWhat is unique about the organization's self-concept of itself? Something that would be missed if the organization were not to fulfill this vision.
What issues might arise among different stakeholders as this vision is realized?
Are organizational practices aligned with the vision? Are desired actions reinforced by performance metrics?
Putting an organization’s mission & vision in place requires working at all levels of the organization. Often, the effort is only made at the top of the organization with the expectation that employee commitment will follow. This assumption is far from true. It is recommended that a specific change program be put in place to develop a shared vision and common understanding of the organization’s vision and mission.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Building Social Capital - the collective feeling of 'We'

When we interact with the organisations in the initial phase of our facilitation , it most often becomes evident that people in the organisation build their plans and strategies of business on the assumption that others in their firm are ready and willing to be team players, act collectively to create or achieve something in the future for the organisation.
The observation, however, is that most often the organisation operates in a fragmented way. The technical people are pulling the resources in one direction, the marketing guys demand better attention to their requirements, finance have seemingly lopsided approach to their allocations and HR brings their own issues unconnected to business. The very resources meant for growing the business are pulling it apart.
In spite of these experiences, organisations are in the habit of assuming that once a good strategy is evolved at the top, people in the organisation will readily act, participate and contribute in a focused way according to the new found strategy.
An orchestra that is ready to play the same song does not come into being naturally but have to be worked out. Similarly every organisation has to create a pre-condition of shared understanding and shared commitment as they build the strategy. This is what is building ‘social capital’. This capital is the most prominent for a business organisation in the modern scenario and is even more scarce and important than the financial capital.
It is quirky to identify and create collective feeling of what “we” (i.e., the firm) should do if there is no strong sense of “we” – a mutual commitment and sense of group loyalty and cohesiveness. Similarly, it can be meaningless if the members of the firm are not committed to go on a journey together into the future.
Most organisations are clueless on how to create such feeling of ‘we’ the collective intelligence or the social capital. One attempt by many organisations to build social bonding is to celebrate the birthdays / anniversaries of the employees or having cultural get together etc on occasions of public festivities such as Onam, Christmas, Diwali etc. Secondly, on encountering inter-departmental turmoil, interpersonal conflicts and other employee behavioral issues, mostly companies resort to training programs on team building, leadership, communication skills, interpersonal skills, etc to the employees. Even after several training programs the conditions in the organisations do not improve which leads to cutting training budgets, snipping certain employees (even though they are valuable to the business), restructuring the organisation, abandoning the attempts to improve with ‘we-have-to live – with it’ attitude etc.
Actually there may be nothing wrong with the employees or with strategy or with the intentions of the business owners. The fragmented functioning in the organisation is somehow subtly connected with the view of ‘big picture’, a shared understanding and the commitment of the people in the organisation. These three are essentials for an organisation to work effectively. Training is not the solution, neither impersonal communications aides such as bulletin boards, manuals, sign posts, websites or awareness building programs. Top management fiat also is not effective in this situation.
But it is possible to develop a social architecture suited for each business / organisation. The only way known now is to lubricate the wheels and gears of existing social system. The traditional meetings need to be converted into animated dialogues. A facilitator who has the knowledge and skill of handling the group dynamics may be engaged to bring together the diverse stakeholders and facilitate to bring out the shared understanding and commitment. Engaging a facilitator for organisational planning is quiet unconventional, but it is needed and there is no other way known how to tackle the organisational fragmentation.
contributed by Sasikanth Prabhu
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Passion is inevitable

In the last two weeks of February 2011, I met at least 50 new interesting people. Many of them are business owners and leaders. While interacting with them it is reconfirmed or rediscovered that "Passion" has a significant place in the success of a business.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Training vs Facilitation

In our workshops, we are moving from training orientation to facilitation. There is lots of arguments about the superiority of training on facilitation and vice versa. There are merits and demerits of training - facilitation processes.
The biggest difference between training and facilitating is
the difference in the ratio of learner involvement vs. trainer
involvement. A facilitator's only job is to get the
participants to explore for answers to issues that matters them through fertile dialogues. The facilitator provokes the participants and lead them to find answers to their conflicts. While leading the facilitation process the facilitator stays outside the conflict and do not make any judgements on the opinions floated. The group come to a decision and the facilitator reinforces their learnings
Monday, June 1, 2009
Slowdown in economic growth is only a slowdown of the psyche!

Before discussing the relation between the economic phenomenon and the Psyche, let us just brush some aspects of the economic system in our society. Every society has a system that regulates the economic activities. There are certain major entities that play key roles in the system. In modern times four major entities play a role in regulating the economic system.
- The government : The government collect taxes and spends the resources for the welfare of the society
- The financial institutions (Banks, Capital Markets etc): The financial institutions gather the savings of the households and use it for the developmental purposes through loans etc.
- The Producing organizations (Products / services): The producing organizations produce products and services required by the household.
- The households: Households work as a unit contributing to the society and develop their own members.
Each of these components has to play their respective roles to keep the economy alive and vibrant. If any of these members collectively change their behavior it may result in slowdown of the economy, for example if Government introduces taxes, it will affect the households decisions, If the Producing organizations change their products it will affect the system.
Conventionally it is held that recession happens when people lose their ‘purchasing power’. When household’s ability to buy is lost, it will lead to lack of sales for the producing organizations. The goods produced have to be sold. But how can they be sold when people have lost their purchasing power?
If manufacturers cannot sell, they cannot generate enough revenue to repay loans and the creditors. The business eventually goes bankrupt and the banks will be full of non-performing assets. In such situations the banks will lend less. This becomes a vicious cycle. Depositors panic because some banks would have collapsed. They withdraw their money, and more banks collapse.
In order survive the recession the Companies will lay off some of its employees and the people who have lost jobs will have lesser money to spend. The people who are have not lost their job will tend to control their expenses and try to save more to survive during the uncertain times. These decisions of the people will result in slower turnover of money and the money supply will get stuck.
However the current is recession is caused by the Financial Institutions in the West, who were exposed to exorbitant risks in the derivatives market. The banks were burst and millions of people lost their savings and large number people lost their jobs.
Also we have to be open to the opportunities around us than to distant places / countries. The near-care focus will yield better results than far-care focus in the long run. Even though we are living in a globalised world we still need to pay attention to the nearest environment we live.
- Become customer oriented
- Develop innovative products / services
- Help the smaller organizations
- If the service provider / vendor cannot be paid in cash, offer shares in the company
- Do Barter
Keep the dreams and goals alive | Invest in social capital | Express the needs and seek help | Help others’ profusely | Be a value creator
Economic slowdown is a temperory phenomenon